Comparison of translucency and opalescence among different dental monolithic ceramics

Shirani, Mohammadjavad and Savabi, Omid and Mosharraf, Ramin and Akhavankhaleghi, Mehrdad and Hebibkhodaei, Maliheh and Isler, Sabire (2021) Comparison of translucency and opalescence among different dental monolithic ceramics. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 126 (3). 446.e1-446.e6. ISSN 00223913

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Statement of problem: Monolithic ceramic restorations designed by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing are increasingly being used by clinicians. With the introduction of new materials, their optical characteristics also need to be investigated. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the translucency and opalescence of lithium disilicate, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate, presintered zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate, polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material, and multilayer zirconia. Material and methods: A total of 50 rectangular plates (14�12�1 mm) of 5 monolithic ceramics were prepared in this in vitro study (n=10). Each zirconia specimen was divided into 3 groups of incisal, middle, and gingival thirds. Each group was then evaluated separately. The color parameters of specimens were measured on 3 backgrounds, white, black, and #3 Ivoclar Natural Die Color material, by using a spectrophotometer. The translucency and opalescence of the specimens were determined by the relevant equations, and between-group comparisons were made. One-way ANOVA and Tamhane post hoc tests were used to compare groups (α=.05). Results: The difference among the groups was significant in translucency (F=137.346, df=6, P<.001), contrast ratio (F=134.148, df=6, P<.001), and opalescence parameters (F=128.028, df=6, P<.001). The 3 zirconia groups (10.87 ±0.54 to 11.88 ±0.26) had a significantly lower translucency than the other groups, and the zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate group (18.14 ±0.74) showed the highest translucency. Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (12.36 ±0.42) had the highest opalescence, and the lowest opalescence was found for polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network (5.43 ±0.28) and the incisal third of zirconia (5.45 ±1.06). Conclusions: The zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate and presintered zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate specimens had the highest translucency and opalescence. The studied multilayer zirconia, which had different cubic phase values from incisal to gingival blank, showed similar translucency over the entire range, and differences among different regions were related to chromatic variables. © 2021 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: cited By 0
Subjects: WU Dentistry. Oral surgery
Divisions: Faculty of Dentistry
Depositing User: zeynab . bagheri
Date Deposited: 12 Sep 2021 08:59
Last Modified: 12 Sep 2021 08:59
URI: http://eprints.skums.ac.ir/id/eprint/9189

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item